What is Proof of Stake (PoS) in crypto?

Proof of Stake (PoS) in crypto explained

Proof of Stake (PoS) is a consensus mechanism that allows blockchain networks to validate transactions and secure the ledger without requiring energy-intensive computational work. Unlike mining-based systems, PoS selects validators based on the amount of cryptocurrency they hold and are willing to stake as collateral. 

This staked capital effectively acts as a security deposit, making sure that validators act honestly at risk losing their funds.

The primary purpose of PoS is to achieve distributed consensus while addressing the environmental and scalability limitations of earlier blockchain designs such as Proof of Work (PoW). By removing the need for specialized mining hardware and competitive computational puzzles, PoS arguably facilitates a more accessible and efficient approach to maintaining blockchain integrity.

PoS emerged as a response to PoW’s escalating energy consumption and centralization concerns. As Bitcoin's mining difficulty increased, the network has begun consuming as much electricity as entire countries, raising sustainability questions. Mining pools have also concentrated power among a few large operators with access to cheap electricity and hardware at scale. However, both systems have their advantages, as we will consider later on.

The basic mechanics of PoS revolve around three core concepts:

1. Participants lock up cryptocurrency tokens as stake, demonstrating their commitment to the network. 
2. The protocol selects validators from this pool of staked cryptocurrency to propose and verify new blocks, typically using a weighted random selection where larger stakes increase selection probability. 
3. Validators earn rewards for honest participation while facing penalties called ‘slashing’ for malicious behavior or extended downtime. This economic model aligns validator incentives with network security, creating a system where attacking the network would require acquiring and risking substantial capital.

The key consideration is that in a well-designed PoS cryptocurrency, the risk of losing your stake by acting maliciously is simply not worth it.

Sign up on Crypto.com

How Proof of Stake works in practice

The validator selection process in PoS networks combines randomization with stake-weighted probability to ensure fairness while maintaining security. 

When a new block needs to be created, the protocol runs an algorithm that considers each validator's staked amount, the time locked and sometimes additional factors like historical performance. For example, a validator with 5% of the total stake might have a roughly 5% probability of selection, though exact mechanisms vary by project.

Slashing represents PoS's primary security enforcement mechanism. When validators engage in provably malicious activities (such as signing conflicting blocks, remaining offline during assigned duties or attempting double-spend attacks), the protocol automatically destroys a portion of their staked funds. 

Slashing penalties range from minor reductions for accidental downtime to complete loss for severe infractions. This creates powerful financial disincentives against attacks, as bad actors must risk their capital to compromise the network.

Stake weight and reward dynamics are designed to create a self-regulating economic system. Validators earn rewards proportional to their stake, typically ranging from 4% to as much as 20% in annual percentage yield depending on the network and total participation. 

As more validators join, rewards often decrease, naturally limiting oversaturation. Conversely, when staking participation drops, higher yields will be offered to attract new validators. This equilibrium helps maintain optimal security and participation levels.

Beyond standard PoS, several variations have emerged:

• Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) – Allows token holders to vote for a fixed number of validators who produce blocks on behalf of the community, increasing transaction speeds through reduced validator sets. 
• Nominated Proof of Stake (NPoS) – Lets nominators back validators with their tokens, while validators handle technical operations, separating capital provision from infrastructure management. 
• Liquid Proof of Stake (LPoS) – Allows stakers to maintain liquidity by freely changing validator delegations without unstaking periods, offering greater flexibility while preserving security.

It’s worth noting that each of these variations involves a trade-off between risk and convenience. For instance, delegated PoS can achieve faster transaction speeds, but it also tends to increase centralization risk.

Learn how staking works in your portfolio

Key advantages of Proof of Stake

Energy efficiency

PoS’s key advantage over PoW is its drastic reduction in energy consumption. Traditional mining networks like Bitcoin consume roughly 150 terawatt-hours annually, comparable to Argentina’s total electricity use. 

PoS networks cut this energy use by more than 99% because validators don’t compete in computational races; they simply maintain online nodes and sign blocks when selected, which requires minimal processing power. For context, Ethereum’s transition to PoS reduced its energy footprint by an estimated 99.95%, eliminating the carbon emissions equivalent of a medium-sized country.

Lower barriers to entry

PoS systems democratize network participation. Proof of work mining demands substantial upfront investment in ASIC hardware, access to cheap electricity, and operational expertise. These are all factors that favor large-scale mining operations. 

By contrast, PoS validators only need enough tokens to meet minimum staking thresholds, and basic computing hardware to run a node. Although some capital is still required, it’s far more accessible than establishing competitive mining facilities, and staking pools further lower the entry bar for smaller participants.

Scalability benefits

PoS’s design enables faster and more predictable block production, allowing higher transaction throughput without compromising security. Additionally, PoS architecture complements new scaling innovations such as sharding (where the blockchain is split into parallel chains) since validators can be assigned to specific shards.

Layer 2 solutions like rollups also integrate more effectively with PoS networks, paving the way for systems capable of processing thousands of transactions per second while still maintaining decentralization and security.

Risks and limitations of Proof of Stake

Wealth concentration 

A fundamental aspect of PoS is that validator selection and rewards correlate with stake size, so those holding large token quantities tend to accumulate disproportionate influence and earnings. 

This creates a ‘rich get richer’ dynamic where early adopters and wealthy participants compound their holdings faster than smaller stakeholders. Over time, network control may consolidate among a few major token holders or institutional validators, potentially undermining the decentralization principles that blockchain technology was created to achieve. 

While PoW also faces centralization through mining pools, the capital requirements differ in nature, because mining requires ongoing operational expenses while PoS rewards permanent capital holdings.

Security vulnerabilities 

Vulnerabilities unique to PoS include long range attacks and nothing-at-stake problems. Long range attacks exploit the ability for attackers to rewrite blockchain history from very early blocks after acquiring or compromising old validator keys. This works because historical validation requires no ongoing computational work in PoS, so malicious actors can create alternative chain histories without the energy costs that protect PoW chains. 

The nothing-at-stake problem describes validators' lack of economic incentive to choose between competing blockchain forks during disputes, potentially voting for multiple chains simultaneously since supporting all options costs them nothing. Networks implement various safeguards like checkpointing and slashing rules, but these remain theoretical weak points.

Governance centralization 

Centralization emerges when staking becomes dominated by exchanges and staking services. Many token holders delegate their stakes to professional validators or centralized exchanges offering staking services, prioritizing convenience and slightly higher returns over running their own nodes. 

This concentration gives exchanges and large staking providers substantial governance influence, potentially allowing them to coordinate protocol changes or censor transactions. Some networks have seen top validators control as much as 50% of staked tokens, creating scenarios where relatively few entities could collude to compromise network neutrality.

Ethereum's move to Proof of Stake: The Merge

Ethereum's transition from PoW to PoS is inarguably blockchain history's most significant consensus migration. Its development began in 2014 when Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin and researchers started to become concerned with PoW's sustainability issues. 

The path proved far more complex than anticipated, requiring years of research into validator economics, slashing conditions and security proofs. The Beacon Chain launched in December 2020 as a parallel PoS chain, allowing validators to practice staking while the main network continued using PoW. 

After extensive testing and multiple delays prioritizing security over speed, the Merge finally occurred on 15 September 2022, when the execution layer merged with the Beacon Chain.

The immediate impacts were dramatic. Ethereum's energy consumption dropped by approximately 99.95%, eliminating roughly 0.2% of global electricity usage previously dedicated to mining. This environmental transformation removed a primary criticism of blockchain technology and positioned Ethereum as sustainable infrastructure for decentralized applications. 

The Merge also altered Ethereum's monetary policy by eliminating mining rewards, reducing new ETH issuance by about 90%. Combined with the EIP-1559 fee burning mechanism implemented earlier, Ethereum became deflationary during periods of high network activity, fundamentally changing its economic characteristics.

As of October 2025, more than a quarter of Ethereum’s tokens are staked across approximately 1 million validators. The minimum requirement of 32 ETH per validator has also created opportunities for liquid staking services like Lido and Rocket Pool, which allow smaller holders to participate. 

The Shanghai upgrade in April 2023 enabled staking withdrawals for the first time, removing the one-way nature of staking deposits and providing validators full liquidity control. Despite fair concerns that withdrawals might trigger mass unstaking, the network demonstrated resilience with steady validator growth continuing after Shanghai.

Popular Proof of Stake cryptocurrencies

1. Ethereum 

Ethereum dominates the PoS landscape as the largest smart contract platform by market capitalization and developer activity. With its extensive ecosystem of decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, NFT marketplaces and enterprise applications, Ethereum's successful PoS transition validated the consensus mechanism at massive scale. 

Its validator ecosystem includes solo stakers, staking pools and institutional validators, with approximately one million active validators securing the network. 

2. Cardano 

Cardano employs a unique PoS academically peer-reviewed variant called Ouroboros, with the network emphasizing scientific rigour and formal verification in its development approach. 

Cardano's staking system allows ADA holders to delegate to staking pools without surrendering custody, maintaining a relatively decentralized validator set of about 3,000 active pools. The platform focuses on scalability, interoperability and sustainability for global financial applications, particularly in emerging markets.

3. Solana 

Solana uses a hybrid consensus combining PoS with Proof of History (PoH) for timestamps, enabling extremely high throughput of up to 65,000 transactions per second. 

Its performance-first architecture targets applications requiring speed and low costs, from decentralized exchanges to gaming platforms. However, this optimization requires more powerful validator hardware, creating higher operational barriers. Solana's validator ecosystem includes approximately 2,000 active nodes with substantial staking participation from across the ecosphere.

4. Polkadot 

Polkadot implements Nominated Proof of Stake, separating validators who maintain infrastructure from nominators who provide stake, optimizing for both security and accessibility. 

Polkadot's parachain architecture enables multiple specialized blockchains to share security through the relay chain's validator set. With 300 active validators, the network balances decentralization with performance, while supporting a growing ecosystem of application-specific parachains.

5. Cosmos 

Cosmos pioneered the application-specific blockchain approach through its Tendermint consensus engine and Inter-Blockchain Communication protocol. 

The Cosmos Hub uses PoS with roughly 175 validators, while the broader ecosystem includes dozens of independent PoS chains that can interoperate. Staking ATOM tokens provides governance rights and rewards, while securing the hub and enabling cross-chain functionality.

Proof of Stake vs Proof of Work: How do they compare?

Understanding the fundamental differences between PoS and PoW helps clarify their respective strengths and ideal applications. While both achieve distributed consensus, their approaches create distinct trade-offs in terms of security, resource requirements and network characteristics:

Energy use is by far the most well-known differentiator. PoW's security depends on making attacks physically expensive through energy expenditure, while PoS achieves security through requiring validators to put collateral at risk. 

From a decentralization perspective, both face centralization pressures but through different mechanisms; PoW through economies of scale in mining operations, and PoS through wealth distribution dynamics.

How to buy crypto in 5 steps

Looking to buy crypto online? We make it as simple as possible to start:

1. Choose a trusted crypto platform – select a reputable exchange like Crypto.com with strong security and positive customer reviews.
2. Create an account – sign up with your email, complete KYC verification, and set up two-factor authentication.
3. Deposit funds – add money using a bank transfer, debit/credit card, or other supported payment methods.
4. Purchase crypto – search for your preferred crypto on the platform and place a buy order.
5. Secure your crypto – either let us handle the storage or transfer your crypto to a personal wallet for peace of mind.

FAQs about Proof of Stake 

What is staking in crypto?
Staking means locking tokens in a blockchain network to help validate transactions and secure the system. Participants act as validators, and earn rewards in return, usually from transaction fees or new token issuance. It also aligns incentives, as bad actors can lose part or all of their staked tokens.

Can you lose money with PoS?
Yes. Losses can occur from validator penalties (slashing), token price drops, lock-up periods that prevent selling or technical errors in validator setup. Even with rewards, market volatility and operational mistakes mean stakers are not guaranteed profits.

Is PoS more secure than PoW?
Both are as secure as the project that relies on them. PoS relies on staked capital for security, while PoW depends on computational power. PoS offers stronger economic finality, but PoW has a longer real world track record securing networks like Bitcoin.

Do PoS validators get paid?
Yes. Validators earn block rewards, transaction fees and sometimes MEV (Maximum Extractable Value). Returns vary by network but range from roughly 4–20% annually depending on participation and inflation. Larger stakes typically earn proportionally higher rewards, though pools allow smaller holders to participate.

Is PoS eco-friendly?
Yes. PoS cuts energy use by over 99% compared to PoW since it removes the need for mining hardware. This makes its footprint is closer to standard web servers than industrial scale operations. This efficiency has made networks like Ethereum far more sustainable and attractive to institutions.

Important information: This is informational content sponsored by Crypto.com and should not be considered as investment advice. Trading cryptocurrencies carries risks, such as price volatility and market risks. Before deciding to trade cryptocurrencies, consider your risk appetite. If you use a non-custodial wallet, you are responsible for securely storing your seed phrase. Losing it may result in loss of access to your assets. Staking rewards, fee reduction, and other benefits referenced in this article may be subject to eligibility requirements, token holdings, and may change at the discretion of Crypto.com.